Defense capability analysis on NATO doctrine.
We read your doctrine and pull out the capabilities. So your team makes better investment and innovation calls. One to two weeks. Every line points back to where it came from.
Better capability calls.
Capability planning at a defence prime means somebody has to read everything before the next briefing. Allied doctrine. Competitor briefs. RFP responses. That tech forecast from a partner lab. Two weeks of careful reading is the honest number. We do it in two. The Excel goes to your analysts. The PDF goes to your board.
How it works.
Scope.
We agree what's in scope and at which classification floor. Cleared sources only.
Ingest.
One document or ten. Doctrine, competitor briefs, RFPs, forecasts. Whatever's on the stack.
Sort.
Each finding gets tagged as Capability or Enabler and lands in one of six NATO combat functions. National doctrine variants are supported on request.
Deliver.
Excel for the analysts. PDF for the board. Every line back to where it came from.
What you receive.
Same shape every cycle, so you can compare quarter over quarter.
The PDF brief.
Heatmap
Six combat functions × Capability/Enabler. Density at a glance.
Top-N priorities
Ranked findings with the reasoning behind each rank.
Three anchor snippets
Verbatim from the source. Paragraph cited.
Methodology page
How we sorted. What we excluded. What stayed uncertain.
Why use it.
You move faster.
Briefings land in 1 to 2 weeks instead of an eight-week analyst read. Your senior people go back to the work only they can do.
You can defend it.
Every line points back to where it came from. If the board pushes on a finding, you point to the paragraph.
You can compare.
Same NATO raster every cycle. So quarter-over-quarter comparison is real, not a rebuild.
Three formats.
Pick by volume and rhythm. We'll talk pricing on the discovery call.
| Starter | Packages | Studies | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Description | One document. Three to five days. A competitor brief, a doctrine update, or an RFP response. | Two to ten documents in one to two weeks. The board-bound briefing on a competitor cluster or doctrine theme. | Recurring quarterly or monthly. Each cycle in 1 to 2 weeks. Standing capability-planning rhythm. |
| Volume | 1 document | 2-10 document | recurring (weekly, monthly, quarterly) |
| Deliverable | Excel + PDF | Excel + PDF | customized |
What we found in one Arctic doctrine.
The Russian 2S35. The Chinese PLZ-05A. NATO's Arctic Multi-Domain Task Force. Two of them carry a capability the third hasn't built yet. The brief names which.
Have papers piling up before your next briefing?
Thirty minutes. We cover scope, timing, and pricing. If we're not the right fit for your next cycle, we'll say so on the call.